Sunday, December 28, 2008

Powerful Pictures

I'd like to fancy myself as one who holds his own opinions about things. That's why I get queasy come time for end-of-the-year top-N lists. On one end, I feel like I'm allowing myself to be quasi-brainwashed by other people, but on the other end, some of these toplists are so amazing.

Fortunately, there are the lists of the "top" photographs--beau
tiful and powerful and beyond ranking. Once you view them, whether or not something should be in the top ten seems so inane.

Here are some of my favorite collections and selections:
Boston.com: The Year 2008 in Photographs -- One of the most amazing collections of photographs I have ever seen.
TIME Pictures of the Year 2008 -- With an obvious emphasis on news events.
The Sydney Morning Herald Pictures of the Year -- Music to go with the pictures, too.
Pixcetera People's Choice Awards -- Generally much more lighthearted than the previous three, but there are some repeats.

Friday, December 26, 2008

Antarctic Weather

I am wowed. I will never consider last week's temperature of -25°F cold ever again.

Thursday, December 25, 2008

A Disney Surprise

It's incredible.

Wednesday, December 24, 2008

Acronyms

The day I found out that the letters in SAT don't officially stand for anything was a glorious one. It was, as one of my old high school teachers would call it, my "epiphany of the day." The SAT used to be named the Scholastic Aptitude Test, but then renamed to the Scholastic Assessment test, but finally, in 1993, was renamed to "SAT I," without any meaning for the letters.

There are many other meaningless or ridiculous acronyms, many of them being the recursive acronyms used so often in technology. Any self-respecting Unix hacker knows that GNU stands for GNU's not Unix. Those PNGs you work with just mean "PNG's not GIF." In fact there seems to be almost a conspiracy of technology people bent on naming things in the pattern "[name] is not a [something else [name] wants to disavow]." Some of them are even bizarrely misleading. LAME is a widely-used mp3 encoder/decoder, but started out its humble life as an add-on of sorts to the "official" encoder. The inventors of LAME had the letters stand for "LAME ain't an MP3 Encoder," and the name stuck. Perhaps LAME should go the way of the SAT.

Enough with the recursive negativity. There's a whole world of positivism out there that's taken a little too far. Now we enter the world of the needlessly long acronyms. The Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act of 2001 was passed with overwhelming approval and to loud protests. You probably know it better as the USA PATRIOT Act. Do a little matching-each-letter-to-a-word-with-a-crayon, and you'll see that it works. The CAPTCHA you type in when you're signing up for a new web account actually stands for "Completely Automated Public Turing test to tell Computers and Humans Apart." Quite a mouthful for a morphed picture.

In the military, the battleground communications system is sometimes referred to as BACN & EGGS--Battlefield Airborne Communications Node and Expeditionary Ground Gateway System. The military seems to dedicate a whole battalion to acronyms. Some almost seem impossibly unlikely, like CINCUS (pronounced "sink us"), which stands for "Commander-In-Chief of the US Fleet" (don't ask me how that works), an acronym used until 1941. A training program used is named "PAST-A!", which stands for "Pedagogically Adaptive Scenarios for Training--Automated!". And of course, the current war was almost named "Operation--Iraqi Liberation."

Wednesday, November 26, 2008

Hi! I'm Windows Updater! I'm Annoying!

"Hi! Do you want to update your computer? No? Well, that's no problem! I'll just remind you in 5 minutes! [. . .]Now do you want to update? No? Well I'm a considerate fellow! I'll just remind you in 5 minutes! [. . .]How about now? No? Oh, I think I finally understand you clearly now! I'll just remind you in 5 minutes! [. . .]It's been 5 minutes! What about now? Hello? Anyone there? Well, I've waited patiently for a minute, and you stood me up, but I'll still be nice to you and put all your programs and windows away and restart your computer for you!"

Don't let Windows Automatic Updater ever bother you again. Here are two solutions, both assuming the fact that you still want your computer to be updated. 

1. Modifying the Automatic Updates Service
When that restart message starts nagging you, go to your Control Panel-->Administrative Tools-->Services. Then, right click on the "Automatic Updates" row and click "Stop." Now you are free to restart at your own discretion. Note that the Automatic Updates will turn on again when you restart your computer, allowing for future updates.

2. ShutdownGuard
This is my preferred method. ShutdownGuard is an open-source software that lives on your tray and will intercept Automatic Updater's pop-ups, and display a bubble from your tray. You can customize the display options and various other settings to your liking. Thank Lifehacker for bringing this to my attention.


Now if only we can do the same with Adobe Updater, Apple Updater, etc...

Tuesday, November 25, 2008

The Reclamation of Words

When was the last time you said, "That was the coolest thing ever," but didn't mean it? When was the last time you said something was exciting, beautiful, inspirational, or genius, when you actually meant to convey much less than superlative?

The next time you want to compliment something, think about whether or not you actually mean what you say. Save the superlative words for times that actually deserve them. 

Saturday, November 22, 2008

Minority Report Comes to Life

A clip from Minority Report? No. It's real.



g-speak overview 1828121108 from john underkoffler on Vimeo.

Oblong is apparently the company that advised the production staff of Minority Report on the technology of the film, with much of their expertise derived from the founders' research at the MIT Media Lab. Oblong promises to "fundamentally chnage the way people use machines at work, in the living room, in conference rooms, in vehicles."

Keith Olbermann on Prop 8

Powerful stuff.

Saturday, November 15, 2008

William Perry on his Confirmation

The following is a hilarious segment of one of former Secretary of Defense William Perry's lectures in my Stanford MS&E 293 class on national security:

"The Washington Post responded to the announcement by running an article observing that I was soft-spoken and humble, and questioning whether those were the right personality traits for the job of Secretary of Defense. They were simply reflecting the well-known fact that those in Washington that traveled the high road of humility are never bothered by heavy traffic. As a result of the Post article, my confirmation hearing was a surreal experience. Senator Byrd, instead of asking me questions about my views on defense issues, took off on the Washington Post article. He observed that George Washington was humble. Robert E. Lee was humble. And yes, that Jesus was humble. This is true. So he concluded that my humility ought to be an asset. He did concede, however, that in his 40 years in the Senate, he had never before seen humility in a Cabinet officer. After that ringing endorsement, the other Senators fell in line and confirmed me as Secretary by a vote of 98 to 0. After all, they did not want to get on the wrong sides of any of their constituents, who might be admirers of Washington, Lee, or Jesus. That experience was the highlight of my experience with Congress. It was all downhill from there."

Tuesday, November 4, 2008

Follow the Election with Google

Google has a great live map of the election. I've been glued to it all day.



Also, if you haven't voted yet, go find your voting place at http://maps.google.com/vote

Every vote counts!

Wednesday, October 22, 2008

Three Ways to Go Green

  1. Punch everyone leaving a large carbon footprint.
  2. Take a bath in women instead of water.
  3. Email or call your congressperson to urge them to renew the clean energy tax incentives. With the temporarily depressed price for oil, and the dipping economy drying up the investment for new green technologies, especially in venture capital, there is a dangerous risk that alternative energy will suffer a major delay in seeing widespread use. The election is just days away, and if enough people call their congresspeople, they will have no choice but to include energy in their platforms. Go to http://www.wecansolveit.org/ for more things you can do.

Saturday, October 18, 2008

Firewalls

"Connecting your laptop to the local coffee shop's Wi-Fi without a good firewall and thinking you're secure is like using a condom with thousands of holes in it and calling it safe sex."

Make sure your Windows condom doesn't leak.

Wednesday, August 20, 2008

The Olympics

The Olympics are the only thing I can watch for hours on end besides Star Trek. There are 28 sports, subdivided into approximately 300 events. It's a three-week festival of the greatest athletes on Earth engaging in (what should be) friendly competition. However, a few things have marred this Olympics for me.
  1. The NBC coverage has been abysmal. There are 28 sports. Yet it seems like all I see is swimming, gymnastics, track & field, volleyball, and the occasional diving event or basketball game. Of course, to be broadcast at all, the event must have an American with a chance of making it to the finals. Where are the world champion fencing, or field hockey, or soccer, or judo, or handball, or sailing, or table tennis, or trampoline, or any of the cycling events?
  2. The live commentators talk about non-American athletes like soulless automata whose only goal is to stop the glorious and pure American athletes from grabbing their obviously deserved golds. Don't get me wrong. I'm cheering for the US, but like many, I watch the Olympics to witness the best in the world in action, whether or not that be an American. More than a few are very annoyed.
  3. Yes, the Chinese gymnasts are under 16.
  4. Watching any of the good videos online at nbcolympics.com requires Microsoft Silverlight 2.0 as well as verification of cable or satellite subscription. Of course, you can just pretend to have a cable subscription, but using Silverlight instead of Flash was a poor decision, motivated by business deals rather than technology and usability. It might earn Microsoft yet another large anti-trust violation, but of course, not before it weasels its way around Flash and displaces it.
  5. The IOC apparently doesn't like it when people watch the Olympics. They have sent numerous takedown notices to blogs, YouTube, torrent sites, and other media hubs that have been hosting Olympic content. It will be a sad day when the IOC begins to stand for censorship.

Wednesday, July 16, 2008

21

I'm finally 21! Thanks to all those friends who made the day awesome-- Jessica for calling right at midnight (and sending frequent updates on the 14th about how many minutes there were left to my birthday); Natasha, Catherine, Susan for appearing at my room at 12:04 with my first legal drinks and lots of friendly peer pressure; Ari, Patrick, Brandon, Ben, and others at Palantir; my CS106 sectionees that noticed it was my birthday during IGs today at the LaIR; my parents for the amusing gifts as well as money for a new fridge; the friends who wished me a happy birthday over Facebook or over the phone; the people coming to dinner tomorrow; and of course, Wilbur summer staff (Larissa, Jiahui, Marian, Victoria, Sawyer, Mattie, Isaac, and Tim) for the rich, chocolaty Prolific Oven cake decorated with 21 candles at staff bonding.

I'm past the last hurdle before turning 30...

Wednesday, July 9, 2008

Mercedes To Ditch Gas Cars

Hot off the presses, and slashdotted, Mercedes to stop producing petroleum-burning vehicles by 2015. This would be quite something if they succeed, and perhaps a much-needed shock to the automotive industry as a whole if they do publicly commit more money to the effort.

Thursday, July 3, 2008

Why I Don't Have a Text Message Plan

Whoever was the original brainchild behind marketing SMS as a premium "feature" is both a genius and a idiot. Genius because it is now an $80 billion plus industry. Idiot because transferring text should really not cost that much. According to a Techcrunch article, it costs $1310 per MB of text messaging. This assuming 160 byte messages and the 20 cent charge on the 3G iPhones if you don't have a plan. According to AT&T's own 3G specs, the network can provide up to 128kbps in a moving vehicle. So that's 160*8=1.28kbits for 20 cents, while you can download 10 times that amount in a single second. There's something terribly wrong. I believe it will only be time before SMS becomes free after a killer phone messaging web app comes along with free messaging that will dethrone the large networks and their monopoly on SMS.

Friday, June 27, 2008

Keyboard Shortcutting

If you're on your computer or online a few hours each day, and you go to a wide variety of web sites, or use lots of different programs, you have probably realized that using the mouse is a slow endeavor, and that keyboard shortcuts rock.

Here are two that rock the hardest, in my opinion.

1. Launchy (http://www.launchy.net)





Launchy is a text launcher that will revolutionize the way you use your computer. After installing, just press Alt-Space to pop up the launcher, and start typing the name of the program you want to launch, or even non-continuous letters of the program you would like to launch. Then, select from the list using the arrow keys the one that matches. Launchy quickly learns the programs you launch the most, so after a day or two, you'll be amazing everyone with your program-launching skills.


2. Firefox keywords
What if you can search something on google by typing "g something" on your web browser? Or search Wikipedia by typing "wp something"? Or UrbanDictionary, or YouTube search, or hundreds of other possibilities? Well, here's a quick guide on how to set those address bar searches up in Firefox.

A. Go the the page with the search box. I used Wikipedia below as an example. Then, right click in the search field, and click "Add a Keyword for this Search..."




















B.
The following dialog should pop up:












C.
Type in a name for your bookmark, and a short, easy to remember keyword with which you can use your search. In my Wikipedia example, I used "wp".











D.
Then, in the address bar, just type "[your keyword] [your search]" and you're good to go! (Hint: to quickly go the the address bar, just press F6!)

Sunday, June 8, 2008

Private Data

My private information may be public now. Shit.

If you get offers to buy my social security number from some sketchy source, please let me know. kthxbai.

Friday, June 6, 2008

The RIAA is Suing My Printer


There is an interesting study out by the University of Washington's Computer Science department revealing flaws in the detection of copyright infringers online. In the study, it was found that enforcement agencies sometimes used merely the fact that an IP address was seen in connection with a certain file online in implicating a user, without verification that the owner of the IP address did actually download anything, or that the owner of the IP is even a person. With IP spoofing tactics, they managed, hilariously, to get three printers in the CS department to receive DMCA takedown complaints from the MPAA. Is this result likely to get noticed in the next wave of countersuits against the RIAA and MPAA? Probably. Are universities going to change their policies because of this? No comment.

See the official page for the paper, an FAQ, and more details.


(Image courtesy of the Washington University CS Department.)

Tuesday, June 3, 2008

Personal References: Toward a Better System

Here's a hypothetical situation that is all too real: A employee has in impeccable record on paper--graduated from Stanford, interned at all the big-name companies, years of experience in key projects at well-known places, both big and small, and a very smooth interviewer, and seems extremely engaged and excited about the job. S/he is hired, and turns out to be a total slacker. He voluntarily leaves 6 months later, and takes a cushy post at another company, with good references from his two friends he made while in the current company. Lather, rinse, repeat.

This is really something to look at in the hiring process. If a company were to spend tens of thousands of dollars on some new servers, the people in IT would probably look into reviews of the servers in forums, written by current and past users, and more than just one or two firsthand accounts of how well the server functions. The IT people probably would not base the decision on the marketing brochures from the selling company and a cursory demo of the platform.

So why is hiring people any different? Hiring a qualified engineer, business development person, or marketer in the Valley will probably cost you at the minimum $70,000 a year, and can often break $120,000 a year, and yet many hiring managers never make a call to even a candidate's listed references, much less random co-workers. This problem is even more apparent in positions that are temporary or have a short hiring process, when there isn't enough time to check references, or when there isn't a good system for contacting past references.

Stanford's Residential Education (ResEd) system is a good example of this. Residential staff, especially freshman residential staff plays a huge role in shaping the lives of all Stanford undergraduates, and upperclassmen who have already been staff for a year usually are preferred over those who have not, yet there isn't a set system in place for references. The staff member's residents over the past year would be a perfect source of information about the candidate, yet there is a stigma against contacting them, resulting in bad candidates being rehired year after year.

When a draft of a scientific paper is sent to a prestigious journal for publication, the authors (and eventual readers or the journal) expect that the article will undergo double-blind peer review by several other scholars in their field. This ensures that the final published article will be legitimate and have at least a backing of several people in the field. While double-blind reference calling may be difficult, why is there such a stigma against calling random people with which the candidate interacts? The standard system of references is inherently flawed because the candidate provides the names. It's as if you were to ask Microsoft if Windows is secure.

Wednesday, May 21, 2008

I Have Your Public Information In a Searchable Cross-Referenced Database

People say my girlfriend and I are a match made in heaven, and one of the reasons they give is that we both keep frighteningly detailed spreadsheets of various aspects of our lives. "That's so sketchy!" says one, referring to a spreadsheet of a list of dozens of people's favorite things, ranging anywhere from favorite cake, to favorite guilty pleasure, to favorite mathematical topic. Of course, I personally have a spreadsheet of every movie I've seen and wish to see, every book I've read and wish to read, every Star Trek episode I've seen, every flight I've taken, every national park I've visited, every IP address I've tracked, and, of course, the infamous spreadsheet of everyone I've ever counted as an acquaintance, with birthdays, current locations, how we met, contact information, their associations in terms of schools, companies, etc., and my rankings of them on four dimensions relevant to me when I meet or get to know someone. The details of that spreadsheet will stay hidden for all of time (until perhaps an archaeologist from the far future finds it and decrypts it, and writes a thesis based on the theory that those living in academic communes on the western coast of the California continent--because naturally, California will have become its own continent--in the early 21st century tended to regard each other in a very numerical fashion.)

Why is data regarded as so much more malicious when stored in an easily searchable digital format? If I were to tell someone that for everyone I have ever met, I remembered the person's birthday, how I met him/her, what s/he does in life, and how s/he appealed to me in the four dimensions most important to me, and that I could easily recall those facts on command, I would probably be hard-pressed to find a person who did not think that I was a thoughtful, sociable human being. But as soon as I change the word "remember" to "store in my spreadsheet," I suddenly transform into a sociopathic stalker, the types that lounge around in AOL chatrooms and MySpace pages of 13 year-olds and whose vocabulary consists entirely of two- to five-letter acronyms or xoxo. I keep spreadsheets because memories, especially of something as unique as people, are too precious to be tossed haphazardly in the very imperfect storage called the human brain. I am doing nothing more than helping myself remember what would have otherwise taken me much more effort to remember, but I probably would have remembered nevertheless. Even when I search people up in public databases to find a home phone number or the like, I get weird glances as if I had just entered their homes and looked through all their drawers.

I am only 20, but I remember when birthdays were considered private information. Yet, nowadays, I could pretty easily find the birthday of anyone about which I care to have that information. Photography, even painting, was considered an encroachment on privacy at some time in history, but today, there are laws protecting photographer's and painter's rights in public. (For example, in the United States, contrary to popular belief, you have the right to take a picture of a person standing in his/her house, so long as you are standing in public property.) Will other information currently considered semi-private, such as work histories, home addresses, our acquaintances, our feelings and opinions of others, become freely accessible by the public in the future? With the internet racing through puberty, complete with legal acne and all, we are becoming more interconnected than ever. Even with people I have never met, I can, with a cursory glance at their Facebook profile, LinkedIn profile, blog, and/or other web presence, determine their interests, age or birthday, closest friends, current occupation, and current problems in life, and for most people I know, the fact that other people have can find this information doesn't really bother them. Why should it?

So why is keeping my own spreadsheet any different than just searching through Facebook or Google?

Thursday, May 15, 2008

Gay Marriage Legal in California

Equality for gays, after a 4-3 vote struck down the ban on gay marriage, at least until the issue comes up again in November as a California constitutional amendment

Wednesday, May 14, 2008

College Endowments not Coffers of Gold To Be Plundered

Articles like this one in Trees and Things rile my blood. Not only is this activity blatantly predatory, but shows both a lack of concern for many of the nation's pressing issues and a fundamental lack of understanding of (or desire to understand) how endowments work.

Yes, the thing known as the Endowment in most top private universities across the United States is increasing, and yes, there is a deficit, but coveting the money of educational institutions to help offset the national debt is an atrocious proposition. Many congresspeople complain that the major Universities with the $10+ billion endowments should allocate more money to financial aid, and use the money to expand programs and admit more students. However, things are far more complicated than than. Stanford's $17-something billion endowment is not the giant vault that people imagine it to be. It is a conglomerate of tens of thousands of donations, each earmarked for a specific purpose, with only a small fraction going to the "general fund," the part of the endowment where the University has discretion for its use, and another fraction going to financial aid, mostly earmarked for certain groups of students.

Forcing Universities such as Stanford to use a certain percent of their endowment for financial aid may simply be illegal, or, if not, would force schools to allocate more money to financial aid from the general fund than otherwise prudent, diminishing funding for research and other academic activities , the very activities that make the top institutions so successful and attract the world's top talent. Leading from this, there is the conception that the best tuition is no tuition. While this is an honorable goal, it is economically flawed. The schools with the top endowments currently offer the best financial aid in the nation, excepting those few like Olin College that offer a full tuition scholarship for all accepted. These top endowment schools typically offer over 95% of a student's financial need in terms of grants, work study, and low-interest loans. Free tuition sounds attractive, but economically, having a cost equal to the value of the benefit from the education is another way to attract only those students who will value the education. As a staff member of a Stanford dorm, I know that for large events, there should preferably be a small charge, even if there are funds to cover everyone's cost, just to make sure those who sign up will not balk, and that the people signed up at least value it enough to pay x dollars.

So the next question is, why not admit more students? That is perhaps easiest to answer. The value of a Stanford education is that students have the opportunity to take classes from eminent professors and first-hand contact with them, as well as to do research with them. There simply aren't more top professors; they are continually stolen back and forth in a friendly war between top institutions. Admitting more students would have a definitely dilution effect on the quality of education. Ask any student in a Big Ten school, and you will find that contact with a professor is rare and valued. Schools like Stanford, MIT, Harvard, and others, are slowly working to make education material from its classes and seminars available freely online through programs such as MIT's OpenCourseWare.

Finally, the large endowments serve as an important rainy day fund in case of catastrophes. A large earthquake is set to strike the San Francisco Bay Area within the next thirty years, and while all of Stanford's buildings are earthquake-reinforced, there are large collections of multi-million dollar scientific equipment that may be damaged during the Earthquake. The fund serves as a security policy against natural disasters, and equally damaging disasters such as policy changes that result in dramatic funding cuts from the federal and state governments.

There is no doubt that the United States is slowly losing its edge in science and technology. The last thing we need is to punish successful schools for their high donation rates from their successful and happy alumni. I would be less angry if the proposed "endowment tax" concepts would give money back to education, but the billions of dollars the federal government would essentially steal from the top research institutions by modifying some laws to their advantage would would mostly be used for offsetting a few days of fighting in Iraq.

Wake. Up.

Tuesday, May 13, 2008

Biofuels Comparison

A handy chart from the Seattle Post-Intelligencer (via Earth2Tech). Let's hope for algae to mature...
















(Click to enlarge)

Sunday, May 11, 2008

Apple, eBay, Amazon at Bottom of Climate Scorecard

One of my new favorite blogs, Earth2Tech, has just posted on ClimateCounts' release of the latest Climate Scorecard, scoring companies on their efforts at informing and taking action on climate change. Not sure exactly how accurate this is, as Dell is surprisingly low on the list, considering its now industry-standard recycling program and efforts at creating more eco-friendly laptops and servers. This is similar to the well-known "Guide to Greener Electronics" released by Greenpeace, which has a greater emphasis on the use and disposal of toxic materials and release of greenhouse gases in production.

Thursday, May 8, 2008

Play Video Games. Beat Molecular Biologists. Feel Good.

Harnessing the millions of easily distractable minds worldwide, groundbreaking science is being done. Rosetta@Home, the software that is modeled after Stanford's Folding@Home and designed for distributed calculation and prediction for 3D protein shapes on millions of computers worldwide, now has a new feature. As the Economist article describes, the new Rosetta@Home software contains a game in which users (players) can manipulate the 3D protein structure according to basic laws of chemistry and physics in order to minimize energy. This was created due to the fact that 3D protein alignments and folding are still hugely computationally intensive, and often, the best 3D structures are found by molecular biologists working by hand rather than a computer using a heuristic algorithm. Moreover, humans often find these optimal structures faster than would the Rosetta@Home distributed computing network. There are some friendly competitions going on already.

Wednesday, May 7, 2008

Three Issues

1. Carbon Capture and Sequestration (CCS), a longtime pet of congress and "clean coal" advocates, is shown to be infeasible in a report by Greenpeace. Of course, you skeptics out there will immediately point out that a report by Greenpeace is not to be trusted. While Greenpeace does have a tendency to employ radical campaigning and rhetorical strategies that are often more sensational than factual, their reports are, fortunately, always backed by solid facts and prominent researchers in the field. This report shows CCS has several problems, ranging from prohibitively high costs, lack of suitable storage, and a significant increase in non-CO2 emissions resulting from the capture process. Read it. It's interesting.

2. It's not often that Human Rights Watch has a news release on the US (besides Guantanamo, but according to the current administration, that's not US soil anyway). Today, they have release a report showing the wide disparity between imprisonment rates of whites versus blacks. Everyone knows this, but HRW has given us the most unambiguous numbers yet collected regarding this issue.

3. Cyclone Nargis. 20,000 dead. Twice as many missing. They need help. Google has set up donation pages for the large world relief organizations. Normally, I urge people to donate to whatever organization they believe would help, but in this case, I strongly urge you to stick to organizations you know have direct access to the country because the Burmese dictatorial government is processing visas for aid workers at a crawl. Skip your morning espresso for a week. Save a few lives.

EDIT: As of 11 May, reliable sources now estimate close to 100,000 dead.

Tuesday, May 6, 2008

The Dangers of Toothpicks--and not what you think

Read the following article:

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,354327,00.html

I mean, I entirely understand the stance the school is taking. Wizards should not be tolerated. Zero-tolerance has worked well in drugs and alcohol prevention, so we can rather safely assume that it should work in wizard prevention as well. Of course, the school should naturally assume the worst when it comes to the toothpick-vanishing wizards of the world. Blink an eye, and they might end up vanishing unsuspecting students, rival teachers, or worse, the number zero or the letter 'A'. Schools across the nations should look up to this school on a hill (or floodzone, as it's in Florida), and weed out all wizards that may be feigning as teachers. Think of the children!

Sunday, April 27, 2008

The genetic revolution may soon yield one more life-saving product, an effective therapy for cystic fibrosis in the form of, surprisingly, a drug already on the market that is currently used to treat depression. See this abstract from Science.

Friday, April 25, 2008

Making Hardy Heron Even Hardier

Thie great article from Lifehacker details how to ease the transition into the newest distribution of Ubuntu, especially if you're giving up Windows or Mac OSX for the first time, and are wondering how you can do all the stuff you used to.

And of course, Ubuntu Hardy Heron is a Longterm Support Release (LTS), so you will be able to get online support for it for at least the next three years if you have the desktop version, and at least the next five years if you have the server version.

Thursday, April 24, 2008

Congress Preempting Genetic Discrimination

An interesting article in the NYT about genetic discrimination:

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/23/business/23gene.html?_r=1&ref=health&oref=slogin

Gattica, anyone?

Tuesday, April 22, 2008

I Get Lazy Sometimes

I was going to build my own blogging tool using php and integrate with my web site, but it was just too much work. Content is more important than presentation, and both are more important than technical details. Well, here begins my foray into capturing what I find interesting.