Tuesday, March 10, 2009

Wolfram Sets the Timer, Will Blow Away Factual Search in May

Go take a look at Wolfram Alpha.



It's a "computational knowledge engine." Sounds impressive, doesn't it? It definitely has the potential to completely blow away any factual search engine that has come previously, of which the most prominent example may be Powerset.

The brains behind this, Stephen Wolfram, is an acclaimed computer scientist that has had many incredible creations already, including the heavily used software package Mathematica, which adds jaw-dropping features in every release, and the stunning if controversial book A New Kind of Science, so he definitely has the background and the resources to create a good factual search engine. In fact, Wolfram has frequently posited, both in A New Kind of Science, and other sources, that he believes computation can be a valid representation of knowledge and science. Hence, Wolfram Alpha is based on what VentureBeat describes well as "terabytes of curated data and millions of lines of algorithms" to create a representation of computable human knowledge.

While I can't say anything to the efficacy of this--it may blow all of us away come May, or it could be the next Cuil--it will definitely be a step forward in the problem of factual search. With Wolfram's entire focus behind this project, and with the concession that this is still a work in progress, I do hope that this will actually work much better than Powerset (which is not to say anything bad about Powerset--they were a little underwhelming, but technically, I can see the incredible technology and useful research that went into building it).

If anyone can get me early access to Wolfram Alpha, I would owe you a big one.

Thursday, February 5, 2009

Slums

This online exhibit on slums in the world is a masterfully executed piece of art.

http://www.theplaceswelive.com/

Wednesday, February 4, 2009

"Stay In School" featuring EPACS

Ashley Baker, who I know from tutoring at East Palo Alto Charter School (EPACS), and who now teaches there as a humanities teacher, referred me to this video:



Absolutely amazing.

I think I even recognize some of those kids, not to mention E-40, Keak da Sneak, and some other big names in Bay Area rap.

This whole thing was put together by Kontac, that rapper wearing yellow stripes near the kids and the turntable near the end. He's a bay area rapper, and also an incredibly dedicated physical education teacher at EPACS.

And here is a pretty powerful interview with Kontac. You HAVE to watch this:


If you stop by EPACS any time, just look to the playground, and you'll probably see him teaching physical education and the importance of exercise and team work and instilling good community values.


And finally, here's a making of video:

Sunday, February 1, 2009

We Are All Going to Explode

Do a Google search for "Yellowstone." The first result is is the National Park Service's official Yellowstone National Park web site, as expected. The second site is yellowstone.net, which promises to help you "plan your yellowstone vacation." Still as expected. But the third is for the Yellowstone Volcano Observatory. Wait, what? Isn't Yellowstone a volcanically inactive geothermal cluster? Why can't we see black lava flows like on Kilauea or even St. Helens?

The answer is complicated, but in a sentence, Yellowstone sits on top of a volcanic hot spot that enjoys blowing up in a "supereruption" every few hundreds of thousands of years, but in the meantime, keeps itself fit by spewing geysers, unleashing thousands of earthquakes, and triggering hydrothermal explosions.

Those supereruptions occurred 2.1 million, 1.3 million, and 640,000 years ago. Do some simple math, and you realize that we are approaching time for another one of these eruptions if the pattern of previous eruptions holds. So let's look at three things: (1) What warning systems do we have? (2) How likely is it that Yellowstone will explode, and will the warning systems catch it? and (3) What will happen if it does?

So. Warning Systems. In this respect, Yellowstone has the best in the world. It is classified by the US Geologic Survey (USGS) as a high-risk area, and is being studied by numerous universities and research organizations. It is watched by thousands of seismometers, sensor arrays, GPS devices, and satellites for any slight change.  If you are the paranoid type, just go to any of dozens of Yellowstone monitoring sites, and you will get your fill of self-perpetuated fear.

Second. Likeliness. Looking at earthquake activities, Yellowstone hasn't changed much in recorded history. Every so often, there is an "earthquake swarm," in which hundreds of small earthquakes happen in a matter of days or weeks. This happens every dozen or two years, but the one in late 2008 caught national attention, as it was one of the most powerful swarms ever recorded. This swarm was also combined with a relatively meteoric rise of the Yellowstone Caldera over the past three years--three inches per year, more than three times the maximally recorded rate of growth since measurements began in the 20s.  However, all these events are normal, and can be explained away by any of a number of reasons--hydrothermal pressure from underground lakes affected by earthquakes, geothermal effects, etc. 

So what if it explodes. Well, we are all doomed. The last eruption covered most of North America in up to a foot of ash, and dramatically changed global temperatures. There were mass local continental extinctions, and the direct effects of the explosion leveled most of what today is Wyoming, Montana, and Utah. Earthquakes of extreme magnitudes would be felt all across the world, and would destroy most buildings in North America. It's not likely that such a quake will strike, but if it does, let's just say we're in a great place to help rebuild the community afterwards.

Finally, rather than worry about the Yellowstone Caldera, perhaps a greater threat is the Long Valley Caldera, right here in California. In its last eruption, it spewed 600 cubic kilometers of rubble across the US, and very recently, there were some 6+ magnitude earthquakes coming from around there. Mounts St. Helens, Rainier, Hood, and Shasta are all close to home, and they happen to be 2, 3, 4, and 5 on the USGS's list of the most dangerous volcanic centers in the United States. Yellowstone, on the other hand, is number 21. 

Maybe I should think twice now before scaling Rainer or Shasta, and tempt fate in Yellowstone instead.

Monday, January 19, 2009

Boring Book Covers

This is an amazingly addictive video. It just shows one plain book cover after another, to a semi-computerized voice reading each title, and some semi-spooky music. It's amazing! 


If you can't see the embedded video, the link is here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sUgjlJ5hEbw



The books "Bayesian Approach to Image Interpretation," "Finite Commutative Rings and Their Applications," and "Music Cognition" actually looks rather fascinating.

Tuesday, January 13, 2009

WikiLeaks Reveals Major UN Snafus

A new WikiLeaks leak reveals "over 600 United Nations investigative reports, over 70 of which are classified 'Strictly Confidential.'" These include anything from weapons trafficking, to rape of refugees by UN peacekeepers, to fraud, to corruption. See here.

If you have not heard of WikiLeaks, it is a site dedicated to open information and anonymous whistleblowing. Hence, it serves as a safe place for individuals to share sensitive information with little fear of retaliation. It is censored in many countries, and has received numerous lawsuits in many countries, and was even shut down for a short time in the United States.

Sunday, December 28, 2008

Powerful Pictures

I'd like to fancy myself as one who holds his own opinions about things. That's why I get queasy come time for end-of-the-year top-N lists. On one end, I feel like I'm allowing myself to be quasi-brainwashed by other people, but on the other end, some of these toplists are so amazing.

Fortunately, there are the lists of the "top" photographs--beau
tiful and powerful and beyond ranking. Once you view them, whether or not something should be in the top ten seems so inane.

Here are some of my favorite collections and selections:
Boston.com: The Year 2008 in Photographs -- One of the most amazing collections of photographs I have ever seen.
TIME Pictures of the Year 2008 -- With an obvious emphasis on news events.
The Sydney Morning Herald Pictures of the Year -- Music to go with the pictures, too.
Pixcetera People's Choice Awards -- Generally much more lighthearted than the previous three, but there are some repeats.

Friday, December 26, 2008

Antarctic Weather

I am wowed. I will never consider last week's temperature of -25°F cold ever again.

Thursday, December 25, 2008

A Disney Surprise

It's incredible.

Wednesday, December 24, 2008

Acronyms

The day I found out that the letters in SAT don't officially stand for anything was a glorious one. It was, as one of my old high school teachers would call it, my "epiphany of the day." The SAT used to be named the Scholastic Aptitude Test, but then renamed to the Scholastic Assessment test, but finally, in 1993, was renamed to "SAT I," without any meaning for the letters.

There are many other meaningless or ridiculous acronyms, many of them being the recursive acronyms used so often in technology. Any self-respecting Unix hacker knows that GNU stands for GNU's not Unix. Those PNGs you work with just mean "PNG's not GIF." In fact there seems to be almost a conspiracy of technology people bent on naming things in the pattern "[name] is not a [something else [name] wants to disavow]." Some of them are even bizarrely misleading. LAME is a widely-used mp3 encoder/decoder, but started out its humble life as an add-on of sorts to the "official" encoder. The inventors of LAME had the letters stand for "LAME ain't an MP3 Encoder," and the name stuck. Perhaps LAME should go the way of the SAT.

Enough with the recursive negativity. There's a whole world of positivism out there that's taken a little too far. Now we enter the world of the needlessly long acronyms. The Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act of 2001 was passed with overwhelming approval and to loud protests. You probably know it better as the USA PATRIOT Act. Do a little matching-each-letter-to-a-word-with-a-crayon, and you'll see that it works. The CAPTCHA you type in when you're signing up for a new web account actually stands for "Completely Automated Public Turing test to tell Computers and Humans Apart." Quite a mouthful for a morphed picture.

In the military, the battleground communications system is sometimes referred to as BACN & EGGS--Battlefield Airborne Communications Node and Expeditionary Ground Gateway System. The military seems to dedicate a whole battalion to acronyms. Some almost seem impossibly unlikely, like CINCUS (pronounced "sink us"), which stands for "Commander-In-Chief of the US Fleet" (don't ask me how that works), an acronym used until 1941. A training program used is named "PAST-A!", which stands for "Pedagogically Adaptive Scenarios for Training--Automated!". And of course, the current war was almost named "Operation--Iraqi Liberation."